Postal Agencies at the Ports of China.
under its control.
Turning now to the questions raised in the correspondence between Downing Street and St. Martins le Grand, the following remarks may be pertinent.
(a). The statement in the G. P. O. of January 1890 that the Government of Hongkong instead of applying the full Imperial subsidy towards the support of the Agencies, makes a profit of over ... dollars a year under the arrangement is refuted by the figures in paragraph 4 supra.
(b) Again, in the same letter it is written that "an examination of the question, however, shows that no addition to the Imperial subsidy is needed to place the Government of Hongkong in a position to fix the salaries of the respective agents at the rates proposed".
It was shown in paragraph 1 that the original subsidy in 1869 nearly equalled the amount of salaries paid to Postal Agents including half the salary of the Shanghai Agent. From this it is a fair inference that it was the original intention of the Imperial Government to pay the salaries of these Agents; moreover, it is not to be supposed that this grant made out of the Imperial Treasury was solely to benefit the Colonial Government, had there been no advantage accruing to the United Kingdom from the course then adopted, the subsidy would not have been paid. If then it is reasonable to assume that the Imperial Government in 1869 benefited by the policy pursued, it is also reasonable that the large expansion...
"
Postal Agencies at the Ports of China.
under its control.
Turning
now to the
questions raised ui the correspondence
between Downing
Street and St. Martins
le Grand, the following remarks
may
be pertinent.
(a). the statement in the G. P. 0.
¢
January 1890 that the
letter of 30th Jan
out of Songkong instead
Government of stongko
of applying the full In perial
subsidy towards the support of the Igencies,
makes a profit of over a
Korward dollars a year
year under the ent is refuted by
arrangement"
present ar the figures in paragraph 4 supra.
the same letter it is
A
(b) agani
written
an examination
of
the
" question, however, shows that no
" addition to the Imperial andsidy
" is needed to place the Government
4
" of Hongkong ui
G
position to fix the
" salaries of the respective agents at
the
"the rates proposed "
125
It was shown ein
paragraph I that the original subsidy
in 1869 nearly equalled the amount of salaries paid to Postal Agents including half the salary of the Shanghai Agent. Frour this it is
a fair inference that it was the original mitention of the Imperia Government to pay the salaries of
Agents;
these
1; moreover it is not to
A was
be supposed . that this grant made out of the Imperial Treasury
solely to benefit the Colonial ~ Government, had there been no advantage accruing to the United Kungdom from the course then. adopted, the subsidy would not have been paid. If then it is reasonable to assume that the Imperial – Government in 1869 benefited by the Policy pursued, it is also reasonable large expansion
adsan LE
that the
of
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.